2011 FOCUS

January 13, 2011 by Vaughn Rachal · Leave a Comment 

I have delayed making this  post for quite some time in that it requires that I admit to not  practicing what I preach…  When providing guidance on developing relationships through online & social technology I suggest the following:

  1. Be yourself.
  2. Provide value.
  3. Stay in communication (schedule time for it).
  4. Make it interesting yet easy to read.
  5. Distinguish “fact” from “opinion” (& identify resources).
  6. Develop conversations (provide ways to connect).

I’m guilty of being “out of communications”; not regularly updating my blog, sending tweets, or updating status on LinkedIn or Plaxo.  2010 was a very tough year personally.  Almost 1 month ago to this day my dad passed away (right before Christmas)…  I must admit that I lost my focus. Between moving my parents twice in 2010 (and now soon to be a third time in 2011 as I move my mom), dealing with identity theft, closing my home renovation company, and then the lost of my dad, I realized that I had too much  going on and I needed to simplify.

So let this blog post be a declaration.  2011 is the year of SIMPLE FOCUS.  My commitment is to focus on helping companies drive sales through new innovations (social, online & mobile technologies) as well as traditional methods (sales training & sales consulting).  If you’re trying to do the same, I will help guide you into it by making the process as simple as possible to implement and adopt.  And I will do it by practicing what I preach.

What’s your focus for this year and how will you get it done?  Whatever it is, if I can help you I’m willing and able…

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribe to our feed and receive future articles directly to your feed reader.

© 2011 by SalesFX, Inc., All rights reserved

Vaughn Rachal is President of SalesFX, Inc.

Share

Raise Your Social Voice or Else…

February 24, 2010 by Vaughn Rachal · 2 Comments 

BIG Rewards await those who are outspoken, relevant,  trustworthy, and willing to contribute…

Aim: Assist professionals and/or businesses that are resisting Social Media to see why embracing it now to develop social relevance,  monitor market conversations, and potentially develop social communities is critical in establishing or maintaining competitive advantage.

I spend a great deal of time thinking, writing, and speaking about how to apply innovations to businesses.  This week I re-examined some of ground breaking books that shaped my professional beliefs to see if certain theories regarding innovation have stood the test of time and if they would apply to the Social Technology phenomenon.  In doing so I discovered that the social revolution is not really a revolution at all but instead it is a evolutionary transformation whose time has come.  If you don’t really see the value or the point, think it is a waste of time, or just waiting to see if it will last, I want to encourage you to embrace it now or quite possibly in a year or possibly two, it will be too late…

The Moore Things Change, the more they remain the same…

In 1991 (the same year the world-wide web was launched), Geoffrey Moore introduced “Crossing the Chasm“.  Moore’s book began by expanding on a theory first published in 1962 by Everett Rogers, “Diffusion of Innovation“.  Moore argued that with discontinuous or disruptive innovations there is a chasm in the technology adoption life-cycle that must be crossed before widespread acceptance of the innovation and critical mass adoption would occur.  His book became a bible of sort to technology entrepreneurs and through word-of-mouth marketing it sold over 300,000 copies…

Prior to Moore, Everett Rogers identified five characteristics that contribute to the rate of adoption.  These same characteristics apply today however Social Media can impact the viability of each.

Rogers suggested that when moving towards critical mass adoption certain characteristics  either restrict or accelerate the adoption process…  The process by which information was communicated through certain channels over time among members of a social system impacted overall acceptance of the innovation.  This was noted in 1962 and by the way, Rogers was studying adoption of a hybrid corn seed by farmers.  I point this out because as I write about innovation I may tend to write about technology because that is my background however the concepts apply to any innovation.

His study focused on adoption by a single culture however it was derived from studying earlier works regarding the spreading of ideas, technologies, language, styles, and religions across cultures by Alfred Kroeber in 1940…  To make a long story shorter, what I found amazing is that in the last 100 years or so most major business revolutions tried to understand and expand on this theory of adoption dating back to 1890.  In the last half century, about every 15 – 20 years an innovation comes along to accelerate the adoption of other innovation and adds validity to what we have known fundamentally for quite some time.  When someone can make sense out of these studies it tends to popularize opinions and enlightens other to take action on applying these new technologies in forwarding their business objective.

Social Implications

Individually and organizationally we have a huge opportunity to engage the masses. Never before in the history of man has there existed the ability for one person (YOU), to have access to 1.5 billion people (web population), the potential to converse or generate interest around a common cause/interest, to do so in your spare time, and the best part… at no charge.  All of this is made possible NOW through Social Technology.   Simultaneously there has never been an opportunity like there is now for customers to create collective opinion regarding their experience (good or bad) with a product, person, company, or organization through social democratization channels as there is today through social technology.  Three primary voices are enabled; the voice of opinion leaders, users, and communities (groups of users or interested parties). The ability to produce cultural change, adoption, and velocity is what makes this such a powerful tool to exploit and such a dangerous phenomenon to ignore; especially considering the fundamental need for businesses to gain new customers and keep the customers they have considering the skyrocketing cost to acquire them.

To fully understand the implications of social media and its importance let’s examine the type of value being sought by adopters of new innovation.  Innovators and early adopters are seeking some strategic value from the new innovations.  These individuals or companies are driven by the vision of how the innovation will drive competitive advantage.  As Moore’s theory suggest, significant momentum is generated once the adoption chasm is crossed.  This is a critical point where word of mouth creates rapids acceptance and others more readily adopt the innovation. Because the market potential is now proven, increase competition enters the market attempting to either out perform the market leader or provide a less expensive alternative.  The market itself starts to take on a life of its own as prospective buyers seek differentiated value from the multitude of choices now available to them. News rapidly spreads concerning product quality or the lack thereof, end user experience, and nuances of the solution.  Finally as the market becomes more saturated, buyers realize their personal value requirements and seek solutions that meet their needs as economically as possible.

Now let’s look at how Social Media plays a role in the adoption process.  During early stage adoption trusted opinion leaders provide thought leadership regarding the innovation and its potential.  The experts paint the vision for how this or that will change the world as we know it.  Recently Steve Jobs told the world about the iPad and how it will change the world.  I don’t doubt that he’s right however other than innovators and some early adopters, many may ask themselves, “Why do I need a larger iPhone?”  Similarly however, when many technology companies were focused on building better PDAs, Apple was delivering the first iPod; the rest is history…   As soon as the product becomes available, I’m sure a lot of people will purchase it for its cool factor.  They will be the innovators and early adopters, however it will not reach widespread acceptance or adoption until consumers begin to advocate the benefit derived from it.  Initial momentum will be developed by thought leaders that paint a vision for its use. Gaming executives and developers are already describing the future of the iPad albeit the initial appeal is to iPhone users… Later in the adoption cycle, the momentum is based upon the collective eWord of Mouth experience of the consumer.

So what does all this mean and what should I do about it?

Social Media will impact innovation adoption rates enabling the sharing of insights by Opinion Leaders or Opinion Experts.  These visionaries provide the voice of the experts and will drive early adoption by discussing the potential competitive advantage or strategic value enabled through new innovation.  This addresses the first characteristic identified by Rogers, relative advantage. Additionally they will begin to address the complexity and compatibility challenges to be expected.  Early Adopters will not waiver balancing risk/reward from gaining competitive advantage vs. following the leader. Their higher risk tolerance will serve the Early Majority and being the voice of the users they will substantiate value through eWord of Mouth.  After they experience the reward for their risk they will share what they did to overcome any challenges thereby addressing some of the complexity concerns of the Early Majority.

The success of the early adopters will be the stories on blogs, in trade rags, and the buzz across multiple communication mediums. The market will gain momentum. Early Majority adopters will begin to feel a bit more comfortable and the voice of the community share their experiences including the compatibility of the innovation in the current environment. Remember they will speak out about both good & bad experiences.  This will allow other potential consumers to mitigate risk based upon the trial experience and observation of other early consumers. These testimonies point to Rogers’ five characteristics that effect rate of adoption and the ability to cross the chasm identified by Moore.

Not only will other potential consumers be listening to the voice of the users and the voice of the community but also potential competitors.  Competition will enter the market with more complete solutions including products, services, support, terms, options, accessories developing a value chain and potentially an industry around the innovation. Think about the many accessories for the iPod and the number of modifications that have been made to iPod/iPhone enable different products…  These adopters represent up to 70% of the available market.

Whether launching new innovations or accelerating growth for current offerings, social media will have a larger voice in market acceptance and sales growth than any other medium.  The more complex the product, the more the customer will rely on thoughts and opinions from trusted expert sources.  Trust is not developed overnight but instead over time.  Regardless of if you’re an individual or a company it is critical to develop a social media strategy, to develop your social voice, and to monitor the voice of your consumers to ensure differentiated value is being delivered and realized.  This is not something that you execute as an event.  It is a strategic investment that takes time to develop however the rewards are huge.

Whether you’re an individual or organization selling new innovations or complex products, ask yourself these questions:

  • Do my customers see me or my company as opinion experts, a trusted supplier, or a vendor of products & services?
  • Am I influencing the market based upon my experience, relevant observation, or strategic vision?
  • What category of buyers represent my largest opportunity and what am I doing to develop my online relationship with them?
  • What is my competition doing in relationship to developing online communities or relationships with the market?
  • Do I know what my customers are saying about me through the socialsphere?

If your not sure of the answer to these questions or the answer is no…  It’s time to RAISE YOUR SOCIAL VOICE… or else…

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribe to our feed and receive future articles directly to your feed reader.

Copyright 2010 by SalesFX, Inc., All rights reserved

Vaughn Rachal is President of SalesFX, Inc.

Share

Choosing how to best communicate…

January 31, 2010 by Vaughn Rachal · Leave a Comment 

When attempting to generate action your communication method can make a huge difference in producing the desired outcome and in producing peace of mind!

On Monday, I had a conversation with a fairly successful entrepreneur who was attempting to get a company to move forward with an opportunity he was promoting.  The company was in the midst of making operational decision regarding where to invest for 2010 and it seemed his opportunity would potentially be delayed or cut.  He decided to escalate his contact to the president of the company who he had met once before.  He asked, “should I send him an email or give him a call?”  I was clear that his purpose was to get them to take action because if it were to be delayed, it would potentially find permanence on the shelf.   He proceeded to read a very powerful email message he intended to send that really impressed me. However, I ask him a question that allowed us to determine his best strategy.  “What if you don’t receive a response from this person in 1 -2 days, what will go through your mind?”  His response was, “well I will probably wonder if he received it after day 1; then after day 2, I may wonder if it was worded too strong.”  Then I asked, “what if it goes on for 2 more days?” He thought for a moment and responded,  “then I may think that they’ve decided to go in a different direction…”

When attempting to elicit action choosing what method to use is critical.  First, consider whether or not the communication method will placed you in limbo.  Limbo is when you are no longer able to take action as you wait for a response or reaction.  It is also a dangerous place where all sort of evil thoughts live.  This leads us to the second consideration, determine the likelihood of being misunderstood. This could be from content or intent of the communication or from lengthy response delays.  Matters only gets worst the longer you have to wait and that then lead to false realities.  A false reality is when you start to create a story in your head about how the communication may have been received or other conclusions you draw based upon no or inconclusive information. False realities lead to loss of power in addition to anxiety.  When you finally do connect with the other party, you’re operating from a weakened state due to uncertainty regarding the interpretation of the communication, etc…   EMail and other written forms of communication can leave the reader with a different interpretation of your real intent and as in the story above, it allows the mind to potentially fester on an inaccurate view.

After thinking about it for a while I came up with this chart that ranks different ways we might communicate with one another.  The idea is that you should choose the best method based upon the requirement for feedback, clarity, and empowerment.  The objective when trying to elicit action, is to be in limbo as little as possible and avoid potential for being misunderstood.

I shared the idea with another executive over lunch and he asked me, “does it make any difference which stage you’re at in the sales process?”  After a brief pause I responded, “absolutely”.  The third consideration, is to consider the stage of the sales process and the purpose the communication serves.  If you’re following up on a sales call and you desire to confirm your understanding, an email or letter is a very powerful way to ensure clarity and alignment with the prospect.

Fourth, consider the generational differences and preferences in communication method.   Studies have shown that many Baby Boomers, prefer phone conversations or letters, where as Gen Xers tend to prefer email a bit more than phone.  Gen Y’s are Txt and IM users, they are a multitask generation.  Generational consideration is also a very important checkpoint.  Imagine you’re a 50 something sales professional and you’re trying to develop a business relationship with an enterprising, well funded start-up in the technology marketspace.  The founders are two persons in their late 20′s early 30′s.  You’ve been reaching out to them, leaving them voice mail messages, shooting them emails and they’re not responding.  After a few weeks you learn through someone in the office that they’re in talks with another company on the same idea you were bringing to them.  When you asked how they found out, you hear they read a tweet regarding it.  Unfortunately even though your solution is better and you can even prove it, your ability to position “best fit” started with how you aligned with the customer through your communication method.

After searching all over the internet, reading countless articles, reviewing all sorts of demographics data, I developed the following chart on preferred communication methods by demographic:

Dr. Carol Goman claims that “Generation Y’s have a very strong ability to multi-task and low tolerance for boredom. This is mirrored in how MTV throws 100 images each minute at their audiences – it is constantly changing and highly image-driven. Technology has changed cognition, and altered the way we need to communicate.”  An important step in communicating with the younger generations has been the move from the “passive” or “pushing” communications to the “active” or “pulling” communications. Generation Y needs active involvement in receiving information or they will quickly lose interest.

Obviously there are a number of other consideration such as are you communicating to someone internal or external to your company, a subordinate or a more senior individual, what is the window of opportunity, is it a priority for the other party, etc…

Just to tie up the loose ends to the story… the entrepreneur didn’t take my advice and sent the email anyway.  Later he call and told me that it blew up on him so we began to strategize on how to clean up the new situation.  This time he executed our collaborative strategy flawlessly.  It’s too soon to say for sure, but he believes that the opportunity now  looks promising.  I’d love to hear your ideas or reaction to this post… wish I could pick up the phone and call each of you but heck, this is a blog… guess I’ll have to tweet.

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribe to our feed and receive future articles directly to your feed reader.

Copyright 2010 by SalesFX, Inc., All rights reserved

Vaughn Rachal is President of SalesFX, Inc.

Share

Social Media & Social Networking: BUZZ or NOISE

January 22, 2010 by Vaughn Rachal · Leave a Comment 

I recently had a discussion with a Sales & Marketing Executive that inspired both thoughts and questions… Are you part of the BUZZ, or just more NOISE?

We exchanged information on LinkedIn regarding email campaigns.  I admit, I did a number of them years ago.  I’m not sure if I did them because they had me feel as though I was prospecting thereby easing guilt about building my pipeline or what, but rarely did they work if it was a “cold” email.  I had some luck referral-based  email campaigns, especially back in the days when emails were accepted as being sent by a trusted source with the best of intentions;  much of that has changed.  Each day I receive an email regarding 1M, 5M, or 10M dollars someone has left me or is funneling my way from some country where I know no-one.  I never knew so many people cared about my financial well being.

Email, when “cold” is just considered NOISE!  Go DIGITAL GREEN with me and save a virtual tree by not using email to attempt to engage a new prospect.  Here’s why they do very little to help drive potential sales.

  1. Too much junk. We receive so many that in order to clean the inbox we them as quick as possible. We may only look at the name or the subject line & DEL.
  2. Statistically improbable. Receiving a response from “cold” emails requires that we send it to just the right person, at just the right time, while they have just the right need, etc…  Need I provide you the statistical probabilities of this happening?
  3. Active polling; not prospecting. Typically emails target “active” opportunities where the seller has a low probability of winning anyway.  Even if we are lucky enough to beat the statistics referred to in #2, “why should they respond to someone they don’t yet know or trust”, as my friend Tom Freese always says…

It seems that everyone is in the BUZZ on Social Media and Social Networking however very few truly use it successfully.  So that it does not end up being just a waste of time and energy one must have a strategy & process for how to use it.  I have conversations each day with someone who is thinking about or has tried to use it only to find it either too frustrating or difficult to manage.  So why should they invest the time.

Here are a few reasons for an enterprise to invest time and effort.  The same is applicable for an individual however my focus is on driving business for the enterprise:

  1. It allows a company/person to position thought leadership in the market.
  2. It creates a virally spread one-on-many bi-directional conversation; that’s saying quite a bit in one sentence.  Bottom-line, persons interested can comment on your blog, tweet, etc… to develop more buzz or to create a one on one interaction.
  3. It helps keep your website fresh and potentially raises rankings in search engines if you develop an integrated strategy.
  4. It helps you to determine the real interest of your market and allows for statistical tracking of what’s BUZZ and what’s NOISE…
  5. It serves as an alignment vehicle for the company by allowing employees (sales, marketing, customer service, & others) to hear and understand positioning and issues that are relevant to company direction and strategy.

I could continue writing for days on the inherent benefits to investing time and effort.  Check out the video below.  If for no other reason, you need to do this because the world is listening through these channels, you just need to find a way to have them tune in…

If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribe to our feed and receive future articles directly to your feed reader.

Copyright 2010 by SalesFX, Inc., All rights reserved

Vaughn Rachal is President of SalesFX, Inc.

Share